<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Nova in Scutum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/</link>
	<description>News and Information About the Pewaukee Astronomy Club and the Harken Observatory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbuchwald</title>
		<link>http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>rbuchwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>South is toward the top of the image.  The finder chart seems too to show a more dense star population below (northward of)  the nova.  The region of the sky was also getting somewhat low in the southwest.  A quick look at Starry Night confirms your hunch.  The field is in the Milkyway near some dark patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South is toward the top of the image.  The finder chart seems too to show a more dense star population below (northward of)  the nova.  The region of the sky was also getting somewhat low in the southwest.  A quick look at Starry Night confirms your hunch.  The field is in the Milkyway near some dark patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twalkowski</title>
		<link>http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>twalkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Its looks like there is a nocticible increase of stars going from top to bottom.  A dust patch of the Milky Way, perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its looks like there is a nocticible increase of stars going from top to bottom.  A dust patch of the Milky Way, perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbuchwald</title>
		<link>http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>rbuchwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim,
I have &quot;subscribed&quot; to the AAVSO Alert Notice bulletins that come via email.  Here is the link to subscribe:  http://www.aavso.org/publications/email/index.shtml#alerts 

The AAVSO website has a FOV plotter which identifies suitable comparison stars.  In this case, there was an 8.3 magnitude star with the id 000-BCD-111.  The alert email notices as well as the charts are free access from the web.  I have registered with the AAVSO as an observer so that I can report observations, but I have not yet joined the organization as a formal member.

The notices are showing up almost once a day.  These are actually quite relavent to amatuer astronomers as they come from professionals or others who are looking for immediate followup on an object. For example, special notice #174 was regarding an otburst of a dwarf nova.  The requestor had a &quot;tentative&quot; detection at mag 11.5 and he was looking for confirmation of this.  I used the Harken Observatory to check at that location and did NOT see an 11th magnitude object, actually nothing brighter than 15th.  I looked today and the few other observations put it at about 16th mag.  So its good information that the object was not at mag 11 at the time I made the observation.

This is interesting work and I am learning a few things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim,<br />
I have &#8220;subscribed&#8221; to the AAVSO Alert Notice bulletins that come via email.  Here is the link to subscribe:  <a href="http://www.aavso.org/publications/email/index.shtml#alerts" rel="nofollow">http://www.aavso.org/publications/email/index.shtml#alerts</a> </p>
<p>The AAVSO website has a FOV plotter which identifies suitable comparison stars.  In this case, there was an 8.3 magnitude star with the id 000-BCD-111.  The alert email notices as well as the charts are free access from the web.  I have registered with the AAVSO as an observer so that I can report observations, but I have not yet joined the organization as a formal member.</p>
<p>The notices are showing up almost once a day.  These are actually quite relavent to amatuer astronomers as they come from professionals or others who are looking for immediate followup on an object. For example, special notice #174 was regarding an otburst of a dwarf nova.  The requestor had a &#8220;tentative&#8221; detection at mag 11.5 and he was looking for confirmation of this.  I used the Harken Observatory to check at that location and did NOT see an 11th magnitude object, actually nothing brighter than 15th.  I looked today and the few other observations put it at about 16th mag.  So its good information that the object was not at mag 11 at the time I made the observation.</p>
<p>This is interesting work and I am learning a few things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twalkowski</title>
		<link>http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>twalkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/2009/11/11/another-nova-in-scutum/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Randy,

It was me ;)  I swapped the cameras Saturday to take some pics (see previouis post on guiding).  I&#039;m glad you were able to locate it anyways.  Do you get e-mail notifications of the novae or do you just check out a web page?

Second, for photometry, which star did you use as the magnitude reference?

Great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy,</p>
<p>It was me <img src='http://pewaukeeastro.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I swapped the cameras Saturday to take some pics (see previouis post on guiding).  I&#8217;m glad you were able to locate it anyways.  Do you get e-mail notifications of the novae or do you just check out a web page?</p>
<p>Second, for photometry, which star did you use as the magnitude reference?</p>
<p>Great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

